[BLlogo7.gif]

Bloodline

Home
About
Call for Papers
Free Membership
Search

XML icon

Educational Features

Image Atlas
Case Studies
Private Lectures
Conference Reviews
Journal Articles
Book Reviews
Glossary


Resources

Conference Calendar
Grants & Fellowships
Hematology Links
BMT Reviews
Classifieds


Specialties

BMT/Stem Cell
Cord Blood
Thrombosis
Hemostasis
Laboratory
Malignancies
Pediatrics
Red Cell Disorders
Infections
Transfusion Medicine
Veterinary


websel.gif:

toprated.gif:

WBC and Platelet Counting Performance by Hematology Analyzer

White Blood Cell and Platelet Counting Performance by Hematology Analyzers: A Critical Evaluation

Bernard W. Steele, Niou-Ching Wu, Clarence Whitcomb

Laboratory Hematology 7:255-266
© 2001 Carden Jennings Publishing Co., Ltd.

ABSTRACT:

The platelet and leukocyte counts obtained from 3 clinical hematology analyzers (Coulter Gen-S, Bayer ADVIA 120, and Abbott CellDyn 4000) and from 1 instrument in the final phases of development (Coulter LH 750) were compared with counts obtained using flow cytometric methods. We studied samples from 3 subject populations: a platelet control group of 30 subjects with normal or nearnormal hematological values, a group of 31 patients with platelet counts less than 30 x 109/L, and a group of patients with conditions known to affect leukocyte counts. This group included 10 patients with sickle cell disease, 10 with presumed thalassemia, and 10 with renal and/or liver disease. In the platelet control group, the differences between counts obtained using the flow cytometric method and clinical analyzers were of little clinical significance. According to results of a paired t test, the samples from patients with low platelet counts showed that 3 of the 4 analyzers had a positive bias for platelet counts. This bias can be clinically important because it may lead to withholding platelet transfusions from thrombocytopenic patients. All 4 analyzers counted low numbers of platelets with good accuracy but with different flagging patterns. Our limited data suggest that for routine analyzers a platelet count of 15 x 109/L or lower may be the most suitable value to correctly identify patients who need transfusions (assuming a reference platelet count of <=10 x 109/L as a true cutoff). The third sample set, from patients with conditions that potentially cause interference in the white blood cell count, showed different patterns, with the analyzers flagging 0% to 60% of the samples from sickle cell patients, 0% to 30% of the samples from thalassemia patients, and 0% to 20% of the samples from patients with liver/renal disease.


pdficon.gif: Download a PDF version of the full article


sm_cjpLogo.gifCopyright 1995-2010 - Carden Jennings Publishing Co., Ltd. All rights reserved. The material available at this site is for educational purposes only and is NOT intended for any diagnostic, clinically related, or other purpose. Carden Jennings Publishing Co., Ltd., assumes no responsibility for any use or misuse of this material and makes no warranty or representation of any kind with respect to the material available at this site.

Featured Resources



Multiple Myeloma: A Practical Guide to Current Management

TOCpic.jpg:
BloodLine Image Atlas