Automated Reticulocyte Count in Thalassemia
Reticulocyte Counting in Thalassemia Using Different Automated
Technologies
Pornvaree Lamchiagdhase, Kovit Pattanapanyasat, Wanna Muangsup
Laboratory Hematology 6:73-78
© 2000 Carden Jennings Publishing Co., Ltd.
The reticulocyte count represents an important test in the study of
marrow erythropoietic activity. Automated techniques have led to a
significant improvement in the accuracy and precision of reticulocyte
enumeration compared with manual counting. This study compared
automated reticulocyte counting by 2 technologies (Coulter Gen S and
Sysmex R-2000) in samples from 45 healthy subjects and 66 thalassemic
patients (21 hemoglobin [Hb] H, 8 Hb H/Constant Spring [CS], 20
-thalassemia [-thal]/Hb E nonsplenectomy, and 17 -thal/Hb E
splenectomy). There was no statistically significant difference
between the 2 methods, although the Sysmex R-2000 showed a slightly
higher mean reticulocyte count (RC). The overall correlation between
the 2 instruments was r = 0.877. RCs in all thalassemia groups were
significantly higher than in control subjects (p < .0001). There was
no significant difference among -thalassemia syndromes, although
absolute RCs of Hb H/CS patients had the highest values, indicating
better compensatory erythropoiesis. Compared with nonsplenectomized
-thal/Hb E patients, splenectomized -thal/Hb E patients had a higher
percentage of reticulocytes, a higher absolute RC, a higher percentage
of high-light-scatter reticulocytes, and greater mean reticulocyte
volume, mean sphered cell volume, and high-fluorescence-intensity
ratio. Patients with -thal/Hb E showed a more severe degree of
ineffective erythro-poiesis than patients with -thalassemic syndromes.
In conclusion, we have shown good agreement between the 2 automated
reticulocyte counting technologies.
LH.6.2.3.Lamchiagdhase.pdf
Copyright 1995-2010 - Carden Jennings Publishing Co., Ltd. All rights reserved. The material available at this site is for educational purposes only and is NOT intended for any diagnostic, clinically related, or other purpose. Carden Jennings Publishing Co., Ltd., assumes no responsibility for any use or misuse of this material and makes no warranty or representation of any kind with respect to the material available at this site.
|
|